Is already making headlines because of the explicitness of its sexual violence (especially two acts of genital mutilation). location are comparisons to be successful with the current discernment for “torture porn” horror, but a better initial reference point is a grouping of 1970s films: ’s concerns are contemporary—gender, ecology, science—and its accomplishment, simple to recognize so long as one is not too distrait by the gore, is to look into these philosophical themes cinematically. , it begins with a child’s death spell mother and father (simply attributable as “she” and “he,” played by Charlotte Gainsbourg and Willem Dafoe) have sex.
‘Antichrist’ sure to shock, but it also awes | New York Post
For those who don’t recall, “Antichrist” scandalized Cannes, which isn’t easily scandalized, with its explicit sexual violence. I finally got to see the film this week, and I went expecting to be shocked — and so I wasn’t. Not bothered by the shocking matter — bloody masturbation, a self-inflicted clitoridectomy — I was discharged to concentrate on the strong points of von Trier’s film.
THE ‘ANTICHRIST’ COMETH | New York Post
THE movie that scan dalized Cannes 2009 is headed here. “Antichrist,” by the great Dane Lars von Trier, is one of 29 films from 17 countries that purpose unspool in the main section of the New York Film Festival, which is returning to president Center’s Alice solon Hall (newly renovated) after an want of several years. “Antichrist” stars Charlotte Gainsbourg and Willem Dafoe as a grieving couple who retreat to a cabin in the woods.